2011 E63 Horsepower
E63AMG6y ago
The next one will be pumping out close to 600bhp if not more! My dealer told me the new engine could also be based on the AMG GTS or the current one 5.5L TT with extra tweaks if emission is not a problem for some countries in EU region.
Add the FL please!
Jon11y ago
Did a 1:50.00 on Laguna Seca, with performance package. ESP on.
Mike B11y ago
Oh sorry haha, I didn't see that
Inline 6 rules11y ago
@Mike B
The car you've linked is the new E 63 AMG with 5,5 l twinturbo engine. This has the "old" 6.2 l n/a engine, so the torque is right.
The 1765 kg is also right, the Mercedes page says 1840 kg and it is mentioned that it includes the +75 kg.
Mike B11y ago
and Torque is 700Nm
benzsl12y ago
0-50kph:1,9
0-100kph:4,3
0-200kph:14,2
0-250kph:24,8
1/4 mile:12,42
Resourc from:AutoBild Sportscar Jan.2011
Please update the data
2212y ago
Typical for BMW fans like Babken to talk crap. Its funny how mercedes makes a car sets a lap time then a year later BMW makes a car and they say ˝our car is better˝. A YEAR LATER? Why dont they releas a car on the same day same year?
Anonymous13y ago
Displacement should be 6.2l, not 6.3.
Press release first mentions 6.3-liter V8 engine and then later states 6208 cc. To comply with German law, Mercedes-Benz is required to round up the displacement figure to 6.3 when used for marketing purposes.
I think the site should put 6.2l for accuracy.
doctor benz13y ago
I think a lot of you guys lost the plot.
Caddy is supercharged! That the only way they can keep up?
Look,M,RS,CTS-V,they all good,just I've driven them all extensively,at the limit,if find AMG's better.
Personal preferance.
Babken13y ago
The next generation BMW M5 will turn both the e63 amg and cts-v to ashes.
E13y ago
Considering the CTS's power advantage, that .1 second difference speaks a lot about the AMG's cornering. Also note the Mercedes won the figure 8 test. The next gen CTS-V is going to have to step up the game.
FastestLaps13y ago
Beating CTS-V by .1 second at Willow Springs is the least of E63's achievements.
It is obvious that CTS-V still gives the biggest bang per buck. But, strangely, I feel that the E63 actually holds more value per buck than the CTS-V. And that is an achievement worth mentioning. And, by the way, I still think the M156 is the best atmospheric V8 on planet.
Anonymous13y ago
by .1s Wow, what an achievement...........................
Anonymous13y ago
@Mr. Turbo............HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHhahahahahahahah LOL
Mr.Turbo13y ago
Many would becuse of many resons 1st > as long as it contain the name MB its better 2> German made 3> Better Quality .. those are enough
PhantomPorsche13y ago
Who would take this over a CTS-V? I would, nothing to do with the emblem just that the shiny trim in the Cadillac is just too much.
pw13y ago
@Pavyarden, E63AMG's time to 200km/h is surely above 13 sec, since it's quarter mile time is 12,7 sec and it gained 112,4 mph. It's unlikely that it will gain another 11,6 mph in less than 0,3 sec. Check 2.20:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GINMe7K_aL0&feature=sub
phavyarden13y ago
this time would be corrected in the next months, i'm sure that this car can hit the 200 km/h in less than 13 secs
audi r813y ago
14.6 s to 200km/h ... emm soo slow !!
Georg13y ago
dramatical improved Hockenheim shorttrack laptime..
Anonymous13y ago
Coming from an Audi Rs fanboy.
BaX13y ago
RS6 owns this car including M5.
Anonymous14y ago
i think ill take the M5.
Source: https://fastestlaps.com/models/mercedes-benz-e63-amg
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar