2016 Triumph Rocket 3 Roadster Review

2016 Triumph Rocket 3 Roadster Review

Skip to ContentSkip to Footer

Triumph Rocket III Roadster review

Well over a decade after the original's launch, this little-changed derivative still packs a mighty punch and delivers heaps of fun

20 Dec 2017

The motorcycle world has changed hugely since Triumph's Hinckley factory began production of its original Rocket III back in 2004, but the current Roadster has a unique appeal, despite having been around for much of that time. It boasts a 2294cc, longitudinal three-cylinder powerplant that Triumph still describes as the world's biggest production motorcycle engine, and which kicks out an arm-yanking 146bhp, with vast reserves of low-rev torque. Although the Rocket Roadster is undeniably heavy, expensive and slightly crude, it's also comfortable, handles remarkably well and is hugely entertaining to ride.

Pros:

  • • Magnificently torquey motor
  • • Huge bike with heaps of presence
  • • Improbably good handling

Cons:

  • • Can't ignore its weight
  • • Price is also high
  • • No traction control system

Triumph unleashed the original Rocket III mainly in an attempt to attack the cruiser-dominated US market. Although that model wasn't a huge success in the States, it gained a cult following and sold sufficiently well to lead to follow-ups: the Classic, with screen and panniers, the even more comprehensively equipped Rocket III Touring, and the more aggressive Rocket III Roadster.

This added 9bhp to take maximum output to a hefty 146bhp, matched by twice as much peak torque as Triumph's own Speed Triple, all delivered in a wonderfully seamless way that made the Roadster a muscle-bike to compete with Harley-Davidson's V-Rod Muscle and Yamaha's V-Max.

• Best superbikes on sale

The other Rocket models were dropped long ago, but the Roadster continues, available in a Henry Ford-inspired choice of Phantom Black or Matt Black, and priced at a not insubstantial £14,100. It's an old-school bike with a basic, slightly brutal appeal. It's also fast, smooth and remarkably rider-friendly, albeit with a lack of the electronic refinement that most bikes adopted years ago.

Engine, transmission and brakes  4.2/5

Right from the original Rocket, the engine was a vast, longitudinally mounted, three-cylinder unit with a capacity of no less than 2294cc – far bigger than any previous purpose-built motorcycle powerplant. The Roadster's unchanged layout features a DOHC, 12-valve top-end with twin plugs per cylinder, plus liquid-cooling, a five-speed gearbox and shaft final drive. The maximum power output is substantial, but what is more relevant is that the mighty motor produces more torque at idle than most motors do at maximum revs.

The chassis layout is traditional, apart from its size, with the steel frame holding 43mm upside-down forks and twin rear shocks. Triumph borrowed the front brake set-up of its now deceased Daytona 955ie sports bike: big twin discs and four-piston calipers that have to work hard to slow a bike weighing well over 350kg with fuel.

Performance, ride and handling  3.9/5

The giant triple's performance is unique. There are plenty of faster bikes, but few that even approach its ability to cruise gently along, feeling relaxed, then unleash a mighty burst of acceleration at the flick of its rider's right wrist. The Roadster is so grunty that it pulls from 1,500rpm without complaint, helped by sweet fuelling and a torque curve that peaks at just 2,750rpm. It's an addictive feeling, marred only by the fact that, although the Triumph blasts through the 80mph mark and keeps accelerating hard, it abruptly runs out of breath at an electronically limited 120mph.

The reason for the limit is that Triumph was concerned about the potential for wobbles with a heavy load and worn tyres. Nevertheless, the stability is fine, thanks to the strong tubular steel frame (which uses the motor as a stressed member), conservative steering geometry, stout upside-down forks and rangy 1695mm wheelbase. Despite this, the bike handles well, helped by the leverage from its wide handlebar, and by suspension that manages to give a comfortable ride while keeping the Roadster's substantial weight under control.

MPG, running costs and reliability  3.6/5

Nobody buys a Rocket III for low running costs, but it doesn't have to be outrageously expensive, with most owners averaging a respectable 40mpg, and the shaft final drive meaning no chain and sprockets to wear out. However, replacing the gigantic, 240-section rear tyre will become a fairly frequent occurrence if the bike's full acceleration is used regularly. At least, servicing intervals are a fairly generous 10,000 miles or every year, with valve clearances requiring checking at double that distance.

Reliability of the heftily constructed engine has been very good. A few early Rockets suffered with oil leaks, and a gearbox spring could fail, resulting in the bike jumping out of gear between first and second. However, those issues have been cured over the years; and, if maintained regularly, the Roadster is unlikely to require its owner to call on Triumph's two-year, unlimited-mileage warranty.

Design, practicality and build quality  3.9/5

The Rocket's unique, almost cartoonish look, dominated by that huge longitudinal engine, has always been an important part of its appeal, and it has changed very little since the original model's launch in 2004. What has changed the appearance is the presence, or otherwise, of accessories, including screens and panniers, some of which were incorporated into the Touring variants. These add hugely to the Triumph's practicality, along with comfort seats, luggage racks and backrests for rider and pillion.

With its big, 24-litre tank allowing a range approaching 200 miles, the Roadster can make a very efficient tourer, as well as a useful, if undeniably unwieldy, all-rounder. Its low, 740mm seat height helps combat the bike's weight, while build quality is reasonable.

Early machines had painted wheels with lacquer that tended to lift, spoiling the finish. With such a large bike and so many gleaming acres to look after, Rocket owners need to spend plenty of time with polish and cloth unless they stick to dry-weather riding.

Key specs and dimensions

Model

Triumph Rocket III Roadster

Price

£14,100

Engine

2294cc DOHC liquid-cooled triple

BHP

146bhp @ 5,750rpm

Torque

221N.m @ 2,750rpm

Top speed

120mph

Weight

367kg wet

Seat height

740mm

Suspension

43mm telescopic forks, twin rear shocks. Shocks preload adjustment

Brakes

Twin 320 discs front, 316mm disc rear

Fuel capacity

24 litres

Most Popular

New Genesis G90 revealed as striking luxury flagship

Genesis G90 - front

Genesis

New Genesis G90 revealed as striking luxury flagship

First exterior images of the new Genesis G90 luxury saloon have been revealed ahead of it going on sale next year

29 Nov 2021

New BMW Concept XM previews sporty XM production car due in 2022

BMW Concept XM - front studio

BMW

New BMW Concept XM previews sporty XM production car due in 2022

The new BMW Concept XM hints at a sporty V8 plug-in hybrid production SUV

30 Nov 2021

Next-gen Volkswagens to get smarter and more comfortable

Volkswagen tech

Volkswagen

Next-gen Volkswagens to get smarter and more comfortable

Volkswagen is working on a host of new technology, including fly-by-wire steering, a driver-facing interior camera and an intelligent chassis

30 Nov 2021

Skip to HeaderSkip to Content

2016 Triumph Rocket 3 Roadster Review

Source: https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/motorbikes/102135/triumph-rocket-iii-roadster-review

Share:

2017 Honda Rebel 300 Fuel Economy

2017 Honda Rebel 300 Fuel Economy

Let Me Hear Your Rebel Yell!

Japanese cruiser bikes have occupied a cherished space in many new riders' learning tenure. Honda decided to modernize their small-displacement cruiser offering with the introduction in 2017 of the new Rebel 300 and 500 machines.

Though the Honda Rebel 300 shared many components with its 500cc sibling it is very much its own bike, with its own unique character. The Rebel platform takes a simple, raw, cutting-edge style and makes it approachable. The Rebel design is blacked-out, stripped-down, and low-slung, bringing an attitude much larger than the cubic inches beneath the seat.

The choices available are better than ever currently for new riders and Honda smartly keeps the cost of entry low by sharing components across the lineup. Honda proved the strength of the 286cc liquid-cooled single-cylinder four-stroke, using it successfully in both a Sport and Naked configuration, but in this Cruiser chassis, it now brings appeal to a wide range of new riders.

Let's break down the Honda Rebel 300.

Our Take: Why You Should Buy A Rebel 300

2020 Honda Rebel 300 - Female rider

The seat is low and the engine narrow, with an aggressively raked front end and fat tires on large-diameter wheels. Doesn't sound like a description for a beginner bike, does it? Honda stepped away from the old standard of heavy and dripping with chrome to deliver a bike that looks and feels modern and cool.

The trellis-style frame allows for an extremely low 27" seat height, and flat-footing at stoplights is not an issue for all but the shortest inseams. Fitted with mid-mounted controls, the riding position is relaxed and the handlebars sit very comfortably just below the average person's shoulder height. Honda wanted a minimalist look to the Rebel and stayed with a simple easy to read LCD display. Refreshed in 2020, Honda added LED lighting and improved gauges including a gear position indicator.

To live up to the looks requires a decent engine, and Honda has always had a solid reputation for smooth, reliable power. At 286cc, the Rebel 300's liquid-cooled single-cylinder four-stroke is a nice match with only 364 lbs to hustle around. Getting in and around traffic in the city is where the Rebel 300 shines, yes you can certainly keep up on the freeway just don't expect much passing power. Tuned for a broad low-end torque curve compared to the CBR300R, the Rebel 300 is easy for new riders to get moving.

Honestly, the only riders that may find issues with the performance of the Rebel 300 will be those like myself with added inches in the waistline, riders wanting to often take a passenger, and those looking for a long-distance cruiser. The Rebel 300 is built to be an urban cruiser that rewards riders with predictable ride characteristics and few stops at the gas pump.

Bottom line: Honda nailed the look of the Rebel with a clean Hipster Bobber style with all possible components now blacked-out. The chassis design delivers great ergonomics and a low seat height while keeping the weight under 400lbs. The 286cc engine does a great job for a solo rider navigating the city, it would not be my choice for long highway rides or two-up riding. Tuned for torque in the lower RPM, new riders should have a fun, easy time developing their skills on the good-looking Rebel.

Reasons to buy the Rebel 300:

  • 27 hp moves this bike well and it has no problem running at 75 mph
  • How can you not love 71 mpg
  • The low seat height inspires confidence
  • Great exhaust note with more rumble than expected
  • The brakes are good with optional ABS
  • Quite good cornering clearance
  • The fat tires and blacked-out design looks great
  • Affordable and holds its value well

Reasons not to buy the Rebel 300:

  • Heavy riders will want more power
  • Solo seat, not set up for 2 up riding ( accessory passenger seat and footpegs available)

Production Run & Notable Model-Year Changes

Production Run & Model Generations

Introduced in 2017 the Rebel is a clean, modern, Bobber-style bike.

First Generation – Rebel 300 (2017-2019)

2017 Honda Rebel 300 - Red - Profile

  • Monocolor digital LCD
  • 286cc Single-cylinder engine.
  • Optional ABS brakes

Second Generation – Rebel 300 (2020 – )

2021 Honda Rebel 300 ABS_Matte Gray Metallic

  • An assist-slipper clutch that reduces clutch-lever effort by 30%
  • Improved gauges add gear selection and fuel level
  • Full LED lighting
  • A new suspension tuning with stiffer spring rates improves handling

Owner Reviews of the Honda Rebel 300

2020 Honda Rebel 300 - Cornering

Press & Magazines

2017 Honda Rebel 300 Review: First Ride

"The neutral riding position fits well with this bike's overall goal of approachability. I thank my lucky stars Honda had the sense to avoid the tailbone-crunching outstretched cruiser peg position, and that the bars have been positioned in a natural location that has the arms out straight with a slight elbow bend. All together the Rebel's ergonomics and stature with its low 27.2-inch seat height will fit most riders well and provide plenty of comfort."

– Motorcycle.com – Ryan Burns – April 2017

2017 Honda Rebel 300 Detailed Review

"The new Rebel is simple and raw but don't let the minimalistic design fool you; it is a Honda after all and every tiny detail matters. The low, lean silhouette is crowned by an iconic fuel tank, aggressively raked front end, and fat 16-inch tires on large-diameter wheels. The stamped-steel rear fender and narrow frame body result in a stripped form expressing offbeat individuality from every angle."

– Hondaprokevin – August 2017

2020 Honda Rebel 300 Review (16 Fast Facts For City Cruising)

"The 2020 Honda Rebel 300 doesn't challenge you to a fight; it gives you a fun time and makes you look really cool. If this is the image and riding style you're drawn to then, you're bound to enjoy this nimble, fun moto. It is a fantastic, reassuring motorcycle for new riders, yet capable of fun for experienced motorcyclists."

– Ultimate Motorcycling – Teejay Adams -July 27, 2020

What Owners Like

  • The looks – It is modern and badass
  • Riding comfort – Honda ergonomics seem to suit a wide variety of bodies
  • The price – Even new, a Rebel 300 can be out the door for less than $5K
  • Fuel efficiency owners report up to 71mpg with easy cruising
  • The Sound – the exhaust note carries a surprising rumble

What Owners Complain About

  • The tail light on the first generation looks old and not matched to the style of the bike
  • Mediocre gauges on the first generation
  • Suspension is too soft for larger riders

The Bottom Line

Overall the Rebel 300 rocks. Finding a bike that is modern, well priced, and a great ride is a challenge. Honda really delivers with these new Rebel series bikes, they are a massive update from the older, heavy, chrome-laden Rebel 250's.

Honda has done an impressive job making a modern Bobber that isn't intimidating and fits a wide range of rider sizes. Even though parts are shared with the CBR300R and CB300R, in this cruiser chassis the retuning of the 286cc single, gives the Rebel a unique and fun riding experience all its own.

I feel the Rebel 300 shines brightest in the city. Urban rides on the Rebel are relaxed and fun. The riding position works even for riders around 6 feet tall, but anyone that is beyond 200lbs will want the added power from the Rebel 500.

The Rebel 300 is everything you expect from Honda. A solid reliable bike, that will give years of great riding, and even though it is considered a small displacement bike by North American standards, I doubt you will be looking to sell this off anytime soon.

2020 Honda Rebel 300 - In the city


Honda Rebel 300 Competitors

If you're looking at a Rebel 300, you may also want to check out:

  • Royal Enfield Meteor 350
  • Yamaha V-Star 250

Honda Rebel 300 Specifications

The important specs are listed below. See the Wikipedia page for more detailed specifications.

Engine 286cc liquid-cooled single-cylinder four-stroke.
Top speed Est. 137 km/h (85 mph)
Power 27.4 hp (20.45 kW)
Torque 19.9 ft-lbs (27 Nm)
Transmission 6-speed
Suspension

F: 41mm fork; 4.8 inches travel

R: Dual shocks with 3.8 inches travel

Brakes

F: 296mm disc w/ Nissin caliper

R: 240mm disc w/ Nissin caliper

Optional ABS

Tires F: 130/90-16, R: 150/80-16
Dimensions

L: 2,188 mm (86.1 inches)

W: 820 mm (32.3 inches)

H: 1094 mm (43 inches)

Seat height 690.9 mm (27.2 inches)
Weight Wet: 165.1 kg (364 lb)
Fuel capacity 11.2 liters (2.96 gallons)
Fuel consumption 71 mpg (3.3 L/100 km)

Honda Rebel 300 Communities & Resources

Facebook Groups

  • Honda Rebel 300 500 & 1100 Facebook Group
  • Honda Rebel,CMX500,CMX300, ABS. Honda Rebel Facebook Group

Forums

  • Honda Rebel Forum
  • Hondarebelforum.com

Blogs & Wikis

  • Safer Turn
  • ADVrider.com
  • Wikipedia

YouTube Reviews

Link

Link

Link

Honda Rebel 300 Photo Gallery

2017 Honda Rebel 300 Fuel Economy

Source: https://www.bestbeginnermotorcycles.com/honda-rebel-300-review/

Share:

2008 Honda Cbr600rr Graffiti Edition Review

2008 Honda Cbr600rr Graffiti Edition Review

HONDA CBR600RR (2007 - 2008) Review

Honda CBR600RR motorcycle review - Riding

12

At a glance

Owners' reliability rating: 4.9 out of 5 (4.9/5)
Annual servicing cost: £220
Power: 118 bhp
Seat height: Medium (32.3 in / 820 mm)
Weight: Medium (410 lbs / 186 kg)

Prices

New N/A

Used £3,800 - £5,500

Overall rating

Next up: Ride & brakes

4 out of 5 (4/5)

Honda have hit back hard with the track focused CBR600RR. They want their 600 crown back and after our first initial ride it seems they've done it.

  • Related: Honda CBR600 model history

They've rectified the old motorcycle's weak points, namely lack of midrange and weight. The Honda CBR600RR is now the lightest in the class, and has much more midrange and razor sharp handling.

This bike was replaced by the 2009-2013 Honda CBR600RR.

Ride quality & brakes

Next up: Engine

5 out of 5 (5/5)

Honda has shortened the wheelbase and tightened up the steering to make the Honda CBR600RR far sharper. Combine that with the reduction in weight and it all makes the new Honda CBR600RR a formidable track tool. It steers so well, you can really flick the motorcycle around and there so much feedback from the front tyre you can carry loads of brake into the turn.

Engine

Next up: Reliability

4 out of 5 (4/5)

The old Honda CBR600RR really lacked midrange between 7000rpm to 10,000rpm but the all-new 2007 model Honda CBR600RR has had an injection of midrange which makes it punchier. You really notice the extra drive out of slow to medium corners. At the top end Honda have only managed to strain a few more bhp, that should bring it up to speed with the competition.

Reliability & build quality

Next up: Value

5 out of 5 (5/5)

Hondas means quality and the older Honda CBR600RR seemed bullet proof. Even slightly tuned, poorly maintained race motors seem to last, even when they are thrashed week in and week out. We can't see any reason why the new Honda CBR600RR should be any different.

Find out for sure in our Honda CBR600RR owners' reviews.

Value vs rivals

Next up: Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

At just under over an estimated £7,500 the new Honda CBR600RR is not a cheap motorcycle. Suzuki's GSX-R600, for example, is considerably cheaper. But out of all the 600cc supersports motorcycles the Honda CBR600RR always seems to hold its money and due to the high standard of components and general build quality. The Honda CBR600RR will still look like new in a few years time and should make it far easier to resell, too.

Equipment

4 out of 5 (4/5)

The Honda CBR600RR's MotoGP styling is sleek in the flesh and typical Honda build quality runs all the way through. The suspension is fully adjustable front and rear and you can feel every half turn or click. Unfortunately you don't get a slipper clutch as standard on the Honda CBR600RR, unlike its Japanese competition.

Specs

Engine size 599cc
Engine type 16v liquid cooled four cylinder, fuel injected, 6 gears
Frame type Twin spar aluminium
Fuel capacity 18 litres
Seat height 820mm
Bike weight 186kg
Front suspension Preload, compression, rebound
Rear suspension Preload, compression, rebound
Front brake 2 x 310mm radial four pot
Rear brake 220mm disc single pot
Front tyre size 120/70 x 17
Rear tyre size 180/55 x 17

Mpg, costs & insurance

Average fuel consumption 40 mpg
Annual road tax £69
Annual service cost £220
New price -
Used price £3,800 - £5,500
Insurance group 15 of 17
How much to insure?
Warranty term Two year unlimited mileage

Top speed & performance

Max power 118 bhp
Max torque 48.7 ft-lb
Top speed 165 mph
1/4 mile acceleration 11.1 secs
Tank range 150 miles

Model history & versions

MCN Long term test reports

Bike of the day: Honda CBR600RR

Bike of the day: Honda CBR600RR

Today's bike of the day is the Honda CBR600RR. The RR first arrived in 2003 and is a track-based missile, designed solely for demolishing circuits with pin-point accuracy. The bike received some of its final major updates in 2009, before meeting its demise at the end of 2016. This included subt

Read the latest report

Owners' reviews for the HONDA CBR600RR (2007 - 2008)

16 owners have reviewed their HONDA CBR600RR (2007 - 2008) and rated it in a number of areas. Read what they have to say and what they like and dislike about the bike below.

Review your HONDA CBR600RR (2007 - 2008)

Summary of owners' reviews

Overall rating: 4.8 out of 5 (4.8/5)
Ride quality & brakes: 4.9 out of 5 (4.9/5)
Engine: 4.9 out of 5 (4.9/5)
Reliability & build quality: 4.9 out of 5 (4.9/5)
Value vs rivals: 4.7 out of 5 (4.7/5)
Equipment: 4.3 out of 5 (4.3/5)
Annual servicing cost: £220

5 out of 5

19 July 2021

Version: 2008-2009 Model

Year: 2008

Annual servicing cost: £225

There is nothing to not like, it is fast (as far as the road goes anyhow), the handling is sharp and it is comfortable as far as a sports bike goes. It has so much more in every way in my view than the more up to date versions of the similar bikes Honda now make and it will hold its own with bigger bikes on the road although you have to work it a bit harder to keep up. Would recommend it to anyone in a heart beat.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Terrific to ride. Always puts a smile on my face whether its a short blast after work or on the commute on the motorway. It does need to be revved a bit, below 5k it isn't particularly responsive (but that doesn't mean she isn't smooth) but once you get to 7 or 8k she starts to sing and then over 11k and its an absolute missile and sounds like a fighter jet. I have no complaints with comfort - I am 5'8 and a bit under 11 stone. I can see how bigger riders might find it cramped up, but I never have and use it as much to commute on in traffic as I do at the weekend. Brakes are decent enough and it is probably being a bit picky but the front ones lack a bit of bite for a bike of its power. Forget the pillion -the pillion seat is high and it scares the living daylights out of my Mrs and she isn't usually one to complain.

Engine 5 out of 5

Love it. If you keep it above 5/6k revs, it's responsive at most speed and won't get you into trouble but will keep you interested. It is smooth at low speed and a missile once you're going. As long as you're sensible, it could probably be your first "big" bike and you can grow into it rather than buy a modern twin that sounds like a sit on lawn mower and get bored in 6 weeks.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

It's a Honda: always had them and will always have them.

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

I don't think anyone buys a sports bike with a view to modest running costs and if anyone is considering it that way should probably buy a different type of bike. With that said, it isn't over the top like a Ducati or Aprilia (I can be critical because I am Italian).

Equipment 4 out of 5

The blue, black and white fairings from 2007 to 2008 are great colours. Bridgestone Battlax are decent all round tyres for road riding and what I have on.

Buying experience: Bought from a dealer local to me who deals in second hand sports bikes. Great service. Find it almost impossible to buy from a main dealer unless you've done a PCP deal, want to do a PCP deal or have an almost new bike to trade. Anything more than 3 years old and it seems dealers aren't interested, regardless of the state of your bike. Suits me, I'd rather own my bike than get fleeced on a PCP deal.

4 out of 5 Her names Sheila (previous owner named her and it had to stay)

17 November 2020 by Alex

Year: 2008

Previous owner had the bike lowered, granted it has lots of pros to the overall look of the bike as well as an upper advantage to easily flat foot the ground with no problem but definitely sketchy for overall performance at high rates of speed.

Ride quality & brakes 4 out of 5

Very decent all-around bike. Especially for beginners but, Because my bike is so low to the ground (sold that way by previous owner) higher rates of speed tend to get sketchy at times, but after giving her a solid 10 or so hard rides, truly can't complain that it certainly needs front and rear brakes. (Which was driven with original brakes from previous owner) made it through a whole season with just now needing to replace both front and rear brakes.

Engine 4 out of 5

Power is awesome, picks up quick, hits high speeds comfortably but certainly not the bike for those who feel limitless on the throttle. Definitely suggest upgrading to a 1000 for those higher, quicker speed seekers.

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Bikes taken 2 fairly hard digs to the ground (due to motor vehicle accidents) yet, after tearing her apart, and replacing all necessary parts, have yet to have a single solitary issue with any part of the bike. Great on gas, temp always stays cool so never worry often about overheating, and definitely recommended for beginner riders to learn on especially where it's so light in weight, most certainly reliable bike for sure.

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

All servicing done to the bike is done by myself as well as my fiancé who's quite experienced with bikes overall. Mainly just order any necessity parts that are needed at time of maintenance, he takes care of majority of the upkeep on the bike itself. Depending on what is being serviced (for ex. oil change, filter, spark plugs, roaders, pads, fairings, etc) try our best to avoid screwing around with major parts that enhance the performance of the bike like taking off the tires, forks, even any type of chain adjustments or main engine type repairs.....otherwise, mainly the major parts in particular that require specific equipment/experience to assure the correct realignments necessary, or upkeep of the bike at top performance just about all work is done on my own aside from purchasing the parts. Roughly between $1,000-$1,800 if not less in running costs.

Equipment 4 out of 5

Favorite feature of the bike standard definitely has to be overall performance the bike puts out. Comfortable and reliable, but don't recommend a lowering kit for those who don't know how to handle a bike. Personally, I love the lowered feature to the bike I feel it makes the bike look sleek, sexy and it's extremely nice to drive considering the few here and there Issues that comes with lowering a sports bike. But, Most certainly recommend OEM fairings, (with the exception of a few companies in between) definitely wouldn't shade/not suggest the recommendation of aftermarket plastics especially for the price compared to OEM but like stated all depending on the company you're purchasing from.

Buying experience: Bought privately by a friend who had recently purchased the bike at 14,000 miles for $5,500 I ended up only purchasing it from him for $1,000 and put in over $1,700 in new parts. Totally worth every penny.

5 out of 5 Great bike and real value

11 February 2020 by Pedro

Year: 2007

Great overall package, lack of rider aids not an issue as it's so well balanced. Get to 11,000 rpm and smile.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Great bike

17 May 2015 by Stoianjb

Year: 2008

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 The best, even now...

15 June 2012 by brmoore

This is still the best 600rr out there, I own the 2008, it has the best power even still years later because they reduced the power 09+, it's fast, it's built well, I ride every single day all year round commute/fun/everything, I've ridden newer GSXR750's/modified GSXR600's etc honda wins everytime, Mine is running a power commander, heated grips, good tyres, got a honda optimate charger, double bubble screen, braided brake lines, R&G crash bungs, original toolkit, full history dyno'd by a dynojet centre, and have a list of £4000 more of modifying to do including leo vince exhaust, it'll sound like a ferrari and go even faster than them than it already is when i'm done with it! I WANT A CBR800RR THOUGH, MAKE IT HONDA!!!!!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 5 out of 5

4 out of 5 CBR600RR Perfect

29 September 2009 by Hondavfr800

I purchased this bike new in September 2008, after test riding both my more favoured choice, the GSXR600 and the CBR600RR. The trouble was the CBR was so much better, it felt so planted on the road, a roomier riding position, mid range felt cleaner and what appeared to be better build quality. Head won, heart lost. A year later, I still love the CBR and during that time I have added a few minor tasteful extras like a puig double bubble screen and some carbon effect pieces but to stop me from selling the bike I needed more comfort. I changed the clip ons for Helibars as I suffered from achy wrists and a strange neck problem which felt like I was craning my neck to see the road head. The heli bars have made a huge difference, whilst you are slightly more upright, it makes the usual traffic queues and two up riding bearable and not painful. This hasn't turned the CBR into a tourer, it still loves the twisties but now it can also do the dull bit of riding easier. It has been said that this is an easy bike to ride and it can flatter your abilities through corners and I can't disagree with that comment, it really is a doddle to ride and I've never felt the need to change any of the suspension settings. Like all 600's sports, the CBR isn't lightening quick off the mark unless you're that way inclined, but this just makes it easier for novices not to feel scared. For me the mid range is ample, even two up, to over take without having to go berserk through the rev range. Not something most people care about but the mirrors are brilliant and Honda really do know how to make a quality machine, the finish is still superb. Economy, another thing people don't usually mention, I get around 45mpg on my varied rides and insurance costs can be reasonable with the right circumstances. I guess my only minor gripes are the exhaust note circa 3k, it feels like your ears are about to burst, it's that bad, the vibes through the bars at low revs and the low standard screen which impedes the view of the speedo.( Puig screen looks good! )

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

4 out of 5 The best 600 you can buy

09 February 2009 by hafidk

I brought my CBR600rr new in January 2008. I ride it every day come rain or shine. I have taken it on 3 track days, 2 trips into Europe, including France, Italy, Switzerland, Germany and the awesome Nuburgring. To date I have covered almost 15,000 miles in a year so this isn't your standard review of a bike that's done a couple hundred dry miles. The handling is sharp and the steering damper is first class, suspension firm but it gives you great confidence in the bends and the riding position is good for a sports bike and much better than any other sports bike I have ridden. The power is strong way down in the taco so you don't have to rev it hard to get it going. If you're looking for a bike that can live in the real day to day world but also a bike that you can take to the track and ride like Rossi then this is your bike. Believe me nothing comes close, the bike is awesome. However there are a couple things if only Honda had listened to their customers they would have made this bike perfect. 1. A slipper clutch. 2. Gear indicator. Without these two things the bike scores 9/10. H

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Honda = Build Quality 2

01 February 2009 by blusta

I purcha....sed this bicycle back in sept and love it, I missed riding for a couple of weeks but when I got back on, it felt smaller then I remember almost like I now swamped it. Any way great bike man, I'm always smiling an thats all that count right...

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 5 out of 5

5 out of 5 best bike for new riders to 600+

14 December 2008 by tripitaka1

ok i begain on cb500 for 2 years i thought i better start with a bike that will not break down easy to work & ride on. the cb was all that then after 2 years i thought time to get bigger bike but nothing silly as i`ve still not got my knee down.i looked at a cbr600f was thinking about £2,000.then the wife (love u loads hun) got me a cbr600rr 2007 from stratstone clay cross (thankyou for all your help)well where to start.over all its 5/5 its great when you get on it start up you are 1.ride & handling is great it goes along at 30mph in town but you know it doesn`t want to it says let me go!you open it up in the blink of an eye you doing 70+ but it doesn`t seem like it!it wants to go 70 and a lot faster but the faster you go the easyer the bike handles.i still haven`t got my knee down but im takening bends 50+ where on cb500 i wouldnt dream of it but this bike makes you feel so alive.equipment4/5 theres no under seat storage!!the own thing u can put under it is you cash cards!!!the 1 thing that is a pain in the bum are the mirrors!! my god you see half your arms in them .so if say you would think of going faster than may be you should you can`t really tell whot car is behind you if say you would like to open it up!!quality & reliabilty well ive just got it so all i can say its well nice.value the wife got it for £5511 2007 4500 on clock with alarm datatool s4-c1.i would say it`s the best thing she ever got me. engine well i don`t rev it as i wouldn`t like to pull a wheelies.but you can ride it in high gear round town easy then open it up there`s no down power its just there waitting for you

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Cant get any better!

15 March 2008 by jdavies123

Absolutely cracking bike. Cant fault it at all. Power and handling are amazing. Takes the micky out of the other 600's in its class.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 5 out of 5

5 out of 5 Honda CBR600RR Review

02 March 2008 by liquidles1

Fantastic bike. Riding position is spot on. Not cramped like my old Yamaha R6, or to "wristy". I could ride it all day. The mid range is so good that you don't feel the need to wring it's neck at all. The steering damper is brilliant, I can't believe they don't fit them to all sports bikes, it holds the front so well that laying it over is much easier, it allows for really quick cornering. the quality is also brilliant. I love it. I may even keep it in my front room, next to the fire ha ha.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 5 out of 5

5 out of 5 Inspires confidence

09 February 2008 by Robin

Light and agile. Great handling. Quick (for a 600). Could sound better though, too quiet and no induction noise. Also tried a 2007 Fireblade and bought the 600.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 4 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Better than an RR5/6?

12 June 2007 by natwebber

Got knocked off my RR6 in Feb by some dozy female driver, but it was the best thing that could have happened. I cannot believe the difference between the RR6 (already a good bike) and the new RR7. The mid range on the new bike is so strong that if you did not know better you would think Honda had finally produced a competitive 750. The handling is also improved and inspires Rossi like cornering, (or at least it feels like it!). The only down side after 1500 miles of ownership is the luggage hooks which are positioned forwards of the rear seat so effectively pull and luggage forward and off the seat. Overall a five star. I tested it back to back against a 07 Fireblade and still chose the 600!

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 5 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Titchy and quick

21 May 2007 by timtech

Got one of these to replace my 2006 CBR600F - instantly I'm carrying 10-20mph extra into very corner such is the confidence in the machine. Very light and chuckable and the exhaust sounds great - best of all you don't have to keep really high revs to get anywhere. Would have liked a gear indicator and the Honda tool kit won't fit on the bike...but I don't think it will break down ;-)

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

5 out of 5 Top Class

16 May 2007 by Grassbagc

Saving already.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 5 out of 5

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Equipment 5 out of 5

4 out of 5 Wow!

14 April 2007 by rs8eq

After two test rides I just had to have one, so I upgraded from my 1998 CBR600F. Awesome handling and 'flickability' a great bike.

Ride quality & brakes 5 out of 5

Engine 5 out of 5

Reliability & build quality 4 out of 5

Value vs rivals 4 out of 5

Equipment 4 out of 5

Back to top

Honda CBR600RR motorcycle review - Riding

2008 Honda Cbr600rr Graffiti Edition Review

Source: https://www.motorcyclenews.com/bike-reviews/honda/cbr600rr/2007/

Share:
banner